Legal Opinion
Rathkopf v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 11, 1961PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiff’s action is for debt on a foreign judgment. The single issue is whether the trial court erred in rendering a summary judgment.
The allegations of the substituted complaint as amended and admitted by the defendant’s answer are in substance that the plaintiff is the duly qualified executor of the estate of Gertrude S. Pearson by appointment of the Surrogate’s Court in the eounty and state of New York as successor to the defendant, who was removed as executor by that court, and that the plaintiff is duly qualified and acting under an ancillary appointment in Connecticut. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Norwood Morris Plan Co. v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Michaud v. GurneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Dougherty v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.