Legal Opinion

Meinket v. Levinson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 1, 1984No. 12125PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This appeal concerns the permissible scope of a collateral attack on a judgment. In the underlying cause of action, the plaintiff, Claire B. Meinket, administratrix of the estate of Edmund L. Meinket, filed suit for money damages against the named individual defendant, Victor Levinson, and two corporate defendants. The defendant appeared pro se and was *112subsequently defaulted for failure to plead.1 The trial court, Jacobson, J., rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The plaintiff thereupon filed a judgment lien against certain real property owned by the defendant and then brought this action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. State v. MalkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Connecticut Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. MilanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Broaca v. BroacaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Asherman v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Romano's Auto ServiceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Cannavo Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. City of Bridgeport v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API