Legal Opinion
Adams v. Rubinow
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 20, 1968PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
The plaintiffs comprise thirty of the judges of probate of Connecticut, each of whom was elected for a four-year term commencing on January 4, 1967. Each of ten Probate Court clerks, as listed in the stipulation of facts, authorized the plaintiff employing him to prosecute this action in his behalf. The named parties defendant are the Probate Court Administrator, the Chief Court Administrator, the Commissioner of Public Works, the Treasurer of Connecticut, the Commissioner of Finance and Control of Connecticut and the Comptroller of Connecticut.
The plaintiffs claim that No. 558 of the Public…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Norwalk Street Railway Company's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Matter of RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.