Legal Opinion
Commissioner of Motor Vehicles v. DeMilo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 23, 1995No. 15136PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The principal question in this appeal is the extent to which a trial court judgment, the appeal from which was dismissed as moot, can later be enforced by the party that initially had prevailed. The defendant, DeMilo and Company, Inc. (DeMilo), appeals from the judgment of the trial court, Hon. David M. Shea, state trial referee,1 which concluded that: (1) the plaintiff, the commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner), could recover from DeMilo, pursuant to General Statutes § 14-67v,2 the cost of remediating the *257conditions that a previous court had found constituted a public nuisance on…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sena v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Personhood Nevada v. BristolNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Advest, Inc. v. WachtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.