Legal Opinion

Croman Corp. v. Serrano

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 1999No. 95-02746; CA A101466PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order in which the Board set aside employer’s denial of claimant’s claim as an impermissible preclosure denial of medical treatment. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 183.482(7) and (8), and affirm.

In October 1994, claimant injured his back and left shoulder and suffered a cervical strain from a fall at work. Employer accepted the claim as a disabling injury and specified the accepted conditions as: “[c]ervical contusion and left shoulder, cervical/back strain.” Sometime thereafter, employer concluded that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. BeldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Altamirano v. Woodburn Nursery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Evanite Fiber Corp. v. StriplinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. McDermott v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. SAIF Corp. v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Blamires v. Clean Pak Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Birrer v. Principal Financial GroupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API