Columbia Forest Products v. Woolner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board overturning employer’s current condition denial. The primary question on review is whether an employer may issue a preclosure claim denial under ORS 656.262(7)(b) 1 for a “combined condition” if its earlier acceptance did not expressly identify the claim as one for a combined condition. We reverse and remand.
We state the facts as the Board found them, supplemented with undisputed evidence in the record. Claimant injured her neck and right shoulder at work on May 29,1996. She had a preexisting condition, bilateral…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- SAIF Corp. v. BeldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wise v. Brooks Construction ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hutchings v. Americas PropaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Mills v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- SAIF Corp. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- TriMet v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.