Legal Opinion
State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 27, 1994No. C3-94-360PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellant argues that his racketeering conviction should be reversed because (1) the state failed to bring an untried charge to trial within six months; (2) the state failed to show good cause for delaying disposition of the untried charges; and (3) the sentencing court erred by imposing a sentence agreed upon by the parties without calculating his criminal history score. We agree and vacate appellant’s conviction.
FACTS
Appellant Rodney Miller has been an inmate at the Stillwater correctional facility since 1984. He is serving a 134 month sentence on a murder conviction.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. VONBEHRENCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. CaldwellNebraska Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. KurzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Resendiz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.