Resendiz v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.*
In this appeal from the denial of a petition for postconvietion relief, appellant argues that his right to a speedy trial under the UMDDA was violated, and that the district court erred by finding that he was not denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to argue that violation. We affirm.
FACTS
On December 14, 2009, appellant Juan Valentin Resendiz was serving a prison sentence on an unrelated burglary conviction when the Hennepin County Attorney charged him with first-degree assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.221, subd. 1 (2008). The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018