Legal Opinion

State v. Caldwell

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 2002No. A-01-115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Irwin, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Stephen L. Caldwell filed a motion to discharge after his trial date was continued beyond the 180-day time limit set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3801 to 29-3809 (Reissue 1995). The district court denied Caldwell’s motion to discharge. Caldwell asserts on appeal that the district court erred when it granted the State’s motion to continue. Caldwell also argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion to discharge. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the district court’s granting the State’s motion to continue.

II. BACKGROUND

On July 7, 2000,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cheatham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. State v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KolbjornsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. RouseNebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. WeichmanNebraska Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API