Legal Opinion
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 2016No. A14-893PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice,
This case involves the relationship between the court of appeals’ certiorari jurisdiction to review quasi-judicial decisions of local governmental entities and the broad power of Minnesota district courts to hear and determine actions brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), a federal civil-rights statute. Mark Zweber, • an owner of a large parcel of undeveloped land, brought a section 1983 action against Scott County and Credit River Township, alleging that they had deprived him of his property without just compensation and violated his equal-protection rights. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Does 1-2 v. Regents of the Univ. of MNCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Bicking v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Doe v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.