Legal Opinion
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Metropolitan Council
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1999No. C6-97-1694PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
This matter arises out of a judicial challenge to the respondent Metropolitan Council’s (Council) approval of the 1998-2000 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Appellant, the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA), is concerned specifically with the Stillwater Bridge Replacement Project (Project) included in the TIP. Appellant alleges that the Project is inconsistent with the Metropolitan Development Guide/Blueprint (Blueprint) and therefore respondent’s approval of the 1998-2000 TIP is inconsistent with the requirements of section 134(h)(5) of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Conservatorship of FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Western Area Business & Civic Club v. Duluth School Board Independent District No. 709Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. R.M.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- County of Washington v. City of Oak Park HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of ShakopeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.