Legal Opinion
Zeman v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 22, 1996No. CX-95-429PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
In this case we must determine if the actions of the City of Minneapolis revoking respondent Robert Zeman’s rental dwelling license constituted a temporary taking for which the United States and Minnesota Constitutions require compensation.
Pursuant to a city ordinance, the Minneapolis City Council revoked Zeman’s license for failing to adequately address “disorderly uses” 1 of his rental property, namely drug deals and associated violence. Zeman brought this action seeking, in part, reinstatement of his license and, some 20 months after the city revoked it, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Westling v. County of Mille LacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- City of Minneapolis v. MeldahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.