Tone v. Parlaman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract. The defendant denied liability and affirmatively pleaded three defenses. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact and conclusions of law sustaining a recovery. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,200, from which the defendant appeals.
The facts are these: The respondents were engaged in the clothing business in South Tacoma. One J. C. Danford had a concession, or lease, as it is called, with the United States Veterans’ Bureau, whereby he was permitted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heaton v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Metropolitan Building Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Fernich-Murphy Printing Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Henry v. LindWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Prager's, Inc. v. Bullitt Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Franklin v. Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Nowoj v. MulalleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.