Prager's, Inc. v. Bullitt Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
This dispute involves a lease. Bullitt Company, the defendant-lessor, appeals from a decision that the lease was modified to eliminate a clause (hereinafter called the “recapture clause”) which gave the lessor an option to cancel the lease if the lessee failed to achieve certain annual gross sales within 3 years. Bullitt also challenges the determination that Prager’s, Inc., the plaintiff-lessee, paid rent higher than required by the modified lease. The excess payments were found to have been paid under “business compulsion” which entitled Prager’s to reimbursement. Finally, Bullitt appeals…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gericke v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- City of Maryville v. CushmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Washington v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- J.B.C. Lockwood, Jr., Successor to Sanford M. Sage, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Emerald Properties, Inc. v. The Wolf Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Pine Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Koehler v. WalesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Stevenson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.