Legal Opinion

Fernich-Murphy Printing Co. v. Palmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1921No. 15839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered July 18,1919, upor findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on con-tract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The pupose of this action was to recover one-half the loss sustained in the plaintiff’s business during the time the defendant was manager thereof. The trial to the court, without a jury, resulted in findings of . fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining a recovery in the sum of $456.40. From this judgment the defendant appeals, and plaintiff prosecutes a cross-appeal.

On the second day of April, 1917, the plaintiff, being then the owner of a printing business of some considerable value, by written contract, employed the appellant to become manager thereof. The contract makes *567it…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tone v. ParlamanWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API