Legal Opinion

Nowoj v. Mulalley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 17, 1970No. 43-40336-3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

This is an action by mechanic’s lien holders to enforce their claims against the property of defendants Walter and Georgia Mulalley, hereafter called buyers. C. D. McCargar, hereafter called broker, was brought in by buyers as a third-party defendant. Plaintiffs’ lien claims were foreclosed and no appeal was taken. Judgment was then entered against broker for the full amount. Broker appeals. Buyers cross-appeal from the trial court’s allowing broker’s retention of $900 commission on sale.

In the spring of 1965, buyers approached broker’s real estate agency and were shown several houses, none…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Collins v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Chaffee v. ChaffeeWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Tone v. ParlamanWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  2. Armstrong v. Taco Time International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Bennion v. Pronto Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Evergreen Implement, Inc. v. PlankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Seattle-First National Bank v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API