Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bradford v. Stubblefield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1950No. 31227PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

This appeal is the outgrowth of a long series of proceedings in which it has been sought to permanently enjoin the operation of a fat-rendering plant as a public nuisance.

In 1945, Emory Stubblefield and his wife, Margaret Stubblefield, purchased forty-one acres of property near the city of Walla Walla. The total purchase price was $14,250. Soon afterwards Stubblefield, who will be referred to herein as if he were the only defendant and respondent, started fat-rendering operations on this property. The operation, as initially carried on, consisted of skinning and cutting dead animals and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Densmore v. Evergreen Camp No. 147Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Hardin v. Olympic Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Group Health Cooperative v. King County Medical SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bacon v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State of Wash. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API