State Ex Rel. Bradford v. Stubblefield
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
This appeal is the outgrowth of a long series of proceedings in which it has been sought to permanently enjoin the operation of a fat-rendering plant as a public nuisance.
In 1945, Emory Stubblefield and his wife, Margaret Stubblefield, purchased forty-one acres of property near the city of Walla Walla. The total purchase price was $14,250. Soon afterwards Stubblefield, who will be referred to herein as if he were the only defendant and respondent, started fat-rendering operations on this property. The operation, as initially carried on, consisted of skinning and cutting dead animals and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Densmore v. Evergreen Camp No. 147Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- McPherson v. First Presbyterian Church of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Hardin v. Olympic Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Group Health Cooperative v. King County Medical SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Bacon v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- State of Wash. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.