Legal Opinion

Tiegs v. Watts

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1998No. 64675-9PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Petitioners Donald R. Watts and Boise Cascade Corporation seek review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division III, which affirmed a verdict and judgment in the Benton County Superior Court finding Petitioners liable for breach of a farm lease and for creating a nuisance by contaminating well water used for commercial farming. We granted review. We affirm.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

The questions presented in this case are (1) whether the trial court properly instructed the jury that any discharge of contaminants or pollutants into Washington’s waters is a nuisance per se in violation of the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Golden Gate Hop Ranch, Inc. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Lundgren v. Whitney's Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Asche v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Grundy v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Grundy v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Asche v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API