Hardin v. Olympic Portland Cement Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Pemberton, J., entered November 25, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for damages from a nuisance.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Respondents own fifteen acres of land near ' Bellingham, Washington, and the appellant owns a tract of *322land lying immediately southerly of, and contiguous to, the lands of respondents. Prior to May 1, 1913, appellant constructed upon its land a large plant for the manufacture of Portland cement, and on or about that date began the manufacture of Portland cement in its plant, and has from that time continued such manufacture to a greater or less degree.
Respondents’ complaint proceeds upon the theory that appellant owns in fee the site of the cement plant and large deposits of clay and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Owen v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. RenickerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Equitable Accident Insurance v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DuganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Sterrett v. Northport Mining & Smelting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hindman v. Texas Lime CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Bartel v. Ridgefield Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- Powell v. Superior Portland Cement, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.