Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. Grassmeyer
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for "Whatcom county, Hardin, J., entered October 14, 1916, in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action for injunctive relief, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellant, as plaintiff, began this action in the court below seeking injunctive relief. It divided its complaint into two causes of action. In the first it alleged, in substance, that it now is, and that it and its predecessor in interest for many years past have been, operating, under valid franchises having many years yet to run, a system of street railways for carrying passengers in the city of Bellingham, which it has constructed and equipped at a cost exceeding $1,000,000; that it operates its street cars on convenient schedules, in compliance with its franchises and the laws of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hadfield v. LundinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. Rapid Transit Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Berry v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Huntworth v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Adams v. Commissioners of TrappeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- City of Campbell, Mo. v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. DeisterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Edward S. Burton v. Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc., a Corporation in the Territory of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.