Legal Opinion

Siegel v. D'Eramo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1992No. 59093PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia A. Blackmon, Judge.

Howard S. Siegel, M.D., and Ophthalmology Associates, Inc., plaintiffs-appellants, hereinafter “Siegel” and “OAI,” appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of part of their complaint, denial of their motion to amend the complaint, and granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by David D’Eramo and Sam A. Cottone, defendants-appellees, hereinafter “D’Eramo” and “Cottone.” For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The pertinent facts are as follows:

In August 1984, Siegel and OAI sued Saint Vincent Charity Hospital, hereinafter “Charity,” and two of its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Juhasz v. Quik Shops, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Trautwein v. SorgenfreiOhio Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Premier Industrial Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. BFI Waste Systems v. City of Garfield HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Bill Call Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  4. Abrams v. SiegelOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API