Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
With the dismissal of United as a defendant, only the claims against CEI remain for resolution by this court. The only issue is whether the trial judge erred in denying Wilmington’s motions to amend its complaint prior to trial.
The language of Civ. R. 15(A) *122favors a liberal policy when the trial judge is confronted with a motion to amend a pleading beyond the time limit when such amendments are automatically allowed. “* * * Leave of court shall be freely given when justice so requires * * the rule states. This court’s role is to determine whether the trial judge’s decision was an abuse of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Solowitch v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State ex rel. Wargo v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by223 opinions
- Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. PolickOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Turner v. Central Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Helman v. Epl Prolong, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Federated Management Co. v. Coopers & LybrandOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.