Legal Opinion
Abrams v. Siegel
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 2006No. Nos. 86386 and 86659PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kakpinski, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant, Howard S. Siegel, M.D., appeals the trial court’s ruling in the suit filed against him by Marc A. Abrams, M.D., Ph.D., individually as a shareholder of Ophthalmology Associates, Inc. (“OAI”) and on behalf of OAI and all other shareholders similarly situated. The rather complex facts in this case are as follows:
{¶ 2} Dr. Siegel began practicing ophthalmology at St. Vincent Charity Hospital (“Charity”) in the 1960s as a shareholder in OAI. He was joined in his practice at OAI by Dr. Carl Asseff. Across the street from Charity was an office building,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gevedon v. IveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Nordquist v. SchwartzOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. LumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Cittadini v. Southwest Gen. Health Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Mohammadpour v. HaghighiOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.