Legal Opinion

Juhasz v. Quik Shops, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1977No. 8387PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

On August 16, 1969, C. T. Bruell, defendant-appellant (hereafter Bruell), leased certain realty to American Seaway Food, Inc. (hereafter Seaway) to be used as a supermarket. Seaway then assigned this written lease to its affiliate, Quik Shops, Inc., defendant-appellee (hereafter Quik Shops), to be used for the same purpose. Quick Shops then subleased the same property to Charles and Christina Juhasz, plaintiffs, to be used as a karate school. Plaintiffs claim the right of occupancy to the building by virtue of this sublease and further claim that Bruell denied them that right. They brought…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reichman v. DrakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Pearse v. McDonald's System of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Bevy's Dry Cleaners & Shirt Laundry, Inc. v. StrebleOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Central Ohio Building & Construction Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Haller v. Borror Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API