Bys Inc. v. Smoudi
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OROZCO, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendants/appellants Salah and Jane Doe Smoudi dba Me Too Me Too (the Smoudis) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment. The Smoudis contend: (1) they filed a timely responsive pleading, precluding the entry of default; (2) because they appeared in the action, they were entitled to notice and a hearing on damages, in the absence of which the default judgment is void; and (3) they demonstrated good cause to vacate the judgment in its entirety. For the following reasons, we find that although default was properly entered, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Searchtoppers.com, L.L.C. v. TrustCash LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health AllianceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- 4qtkidz LLC v. Hnt Holdings llc/beth FordArizona Supreme Court · 2022
- Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. Jorge OthonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.