Legal Opinion

Bys Inc. v. Smoudi

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 9, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 10-0906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OROZCO, Judge.

¶ 1 Defendants/appellants Salah and Jane Doe Smoudi dba Me Too Me Too (the Smoudis) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment. The Smoudis contend: (1) they filed a timely responsive pleading, precluding the entry of default; (2) because they appeared in the action, they were entitled to notice and a hearing on damages, in the absence of which the default judgment is void; and (3) they demonstrated good cause to vacate the judgment in its entirety. For the following reasons, we find that although default was properly entered, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Searchtoppers.com, L.L.C. v. TrustCash LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health AllianceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. 4qtkidz LLC v. Hnt Holdings llc/beth FordArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. Jorge OthonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API