Legal Opinion

Ezell v. Quon

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 17, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0297PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 Jeff Quon appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for relief from a default judgment in favor of Brian Ezell pursuant to Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure (Rule) 60(c). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. We further deny Ezell’s request for attorneys’ fees on appeal because he failed to cite a basis for his request as required by Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 21(e).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling on a motion to set aside a default…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BatemanArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Blair v. BurgenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. In re Digital Music Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand HaddockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. LaosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API