Rogers v. Tapo
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Chief Justice.
The basic issue for determination on this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted a motion to set aside a default judgment theretofore entered against defendant-appellee Nick Tapo.
The procedural snarl which we are called upon to unravel in order to answer this question arose in the following manner: Plaintiff-appellant Eva Rogers purportedly suffered serious personal injuries when a neon sign fell on her while a business visitor in the restaurant of defendant Tapo. The sign had been originally furnished and installed in the restaurant by Arden Farms Co., an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BorchersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Brown v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Commercial Casualty Ins. v. White Line Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Bowles v. BranickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1946
- Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. FarwellArizona Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Hendrie Buick Company v. MacKArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Union Oil Co. of California v. Hudson Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Coulas v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Marsh v. RiskasArizona Supreme Court · 1951
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.