Legal Opinion
Schering Corporation v. Cotlow
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1963No. 7061PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JENNINGS, Justice.
Appellant Schering Corporation was one . of a number of defendants in an action for damages allegedly resulting from the plaintiffs taking one of the drugs manufactured by the corporation. Schering,' a New Jersey corporation, manufactures “ethical drugs.”' The company was not qualified to do business in Arizona and had no statutory or .other agent appointed to receive service of process. It employed three sales representatives in Arizona, one of whom, Dean R. Vaterlaus, worked out of Tucson. On August 8, 1959, appellee attempted service on Schering by personal service on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Frank Savarese v. Edrick Transfer & Storage, Inc., a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Camacho v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re Estate of McCauleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.