Hafner v. A. J. Stuart Land Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
This is a consolidation of 33 suits in chancery. Plaintiffs filed the hills as purchasers against the vendor, A. J. Stuart Land Company, a corporation, to rescind the executory contracts. The individual defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Stuart, are subsequent grantees of the defendant corporation. Prom a decree for plaintiffs, defendants have appealed.
Plaintiffs’ ease was presented in hearing on inconsistent theories, one that the vendor had failed to make agreed improvements, which theory assumes a valid contract, the other that there were fraud and misrepresentation in the inception, which negatives…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Provident Loan Trust Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Security Investment Co. v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Bainter v. FultsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Barnes v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Heppner v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. v. Fitness World of Jackson, Inc. (In Re Dynamic Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- Lutz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Fitchner v. WallingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.