Legal Opinion

Hafner v. A. J. Stuart Land Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 130, Calendar No. 34,190PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This is a consolidation of 33 suits in chancery. Plaintiffs filed the hills as purchasers against the vendor, A. J. Stuart Land Company, a corporation, to rescind the executory contracts. The individual defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Stuart, are subsequent grantees of the defendant corporation. Prom a decree for plaintiffs, defendants have appealed.

Plaintiffs’ ease was presented in hearing on inconsistent theories, one that the vendor had failed to make agreed improvements, which theory assumes a valid contract, the other that there were fraud and misrepresentation in the inception, which negatives…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Provident Loan Trust Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Security Investment Co. v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Bainter v. FultsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Barnes v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Heppner v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
  3. Dynamic Enterprises, Inc. v. Fitness World of Jackson, Inc. (In Re Dynamic Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  4. Lutz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. Fitchner v. WallingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API