Legal Opinion

Security Investment Co. v. Meister

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1921No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Bill by the Security Investment Company against Saul H. Meister and another to quiet title to land. Defendant Meister filed a cross-bill to reinstate a land contract and for specific performance. From a decree for defendant Meister, plaintiff appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Bill by the Security Investment Company against Saul H. Meister and another to quiet title to land. Defendant Meister filed a cross-bill to reinstate a land contract and for specific performance. From a decree for defendant Meister, plaintiff appeals. In December of 1916 by virtue of assignments to it plaintiff stood in the relation of vendor of four land contracts for the sale of four lots located in the village of Ecorse, Wayne county, and defendant Meister by virtue of assignments to him stood in the relation of vendee. The monthly payments…

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). Plaintiff by its bill claims that the deeds to Lefton were without consideration and fraudulent and were made to place the title out of Meister and in one in the service for the purpose of vexing and annoying it and that it had no actual notice of their existence although conceding constructive notice from their record. Defendant Meister insists that they were given to secure money advanced and were in all regards free from fraud. As the debt secured by them has been paid, *341if one existed, and Lefton no longer has or claims to have an interest in the lots and is not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pendill v. Union Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Lozon v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lambton Loan & Investment Co. v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hubbell v. OhlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Niman v. Story & Clark Piano Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commerce-Guardian Trust & Savings Bank v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People's Mortgage Corp. v. WiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Christy Et Ux. v. Guild Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hafner v. A. J. Stuart Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Sabin v. LevorsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API