Legal Opinion
Robberson Steel Co. v. Harrell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1949No. 3815PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
The United States, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, prepared plans and specifications for the development of an irrigation district in the vicinity of Altus, Oklahoma. The program contemplated the letting of contracts to private contractors for the construction of different parts of the canals, ditches, bridges, culverts, flumes, and other structures. A contract was entered into with Barney W. Harrell and May T. Stebbins, partners composing the firm Stebbins Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as Stebbins, to construct the Ozark Canal, and the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- California Sugar & White Pine Agency v. PenoyarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Chisholm v. HouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
- Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.