Bainter v. Fults
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Douglas District Court. . At the August Term. 1873, Fults as plaintiff recovered judgment against Bainter and Barnett, defendants.
Read the full summary
Error from Douglas District Court. . At the August Term. 1873, Fults as plaintiff recovered judgment against Bainter and Barnett, defendants. The trial was by the court, without a jury, and the facts and conclusions found were as follows : “1st. The plaintiff Robert Fults, on the 20th of October 1871, and for a long time prior thereto, was the owner of 160 acres of land in said Douglas county, described as the S.’W.J of sec. 35, in township 12, of range 17, of the value of $3,500, and resided on the same with his family. He was then 69 years of age, illiterate, infirm, from age and physical…
1Opinion of the Court
*329The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by Robert Eults against Ephraim Bainter and George Barnett, for the purpose of rescinding, setting aside, and canceling, on the ground of fraud, a certain executed contract, with certain deeds of conveyance, and other matters incidental thereto, whereby Eults exchanged some real estate and personal property belonging to him for some real estate belonging to Bainter. The principal questions discussed by plaintiffs in error are so obscurely and insufficiently presented by the record brought to this court that we…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Grandi v. LeSageNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Jeffers v. ForbesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Hafner v. A. J. Stuart Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Lucas v. SturrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.