Legal Opinion

Savage v. Nielsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1948No. 7100PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the lower court in favor of the defendant wherein an easement'over plaintiff’s property was quieted in the defendant. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. The defendant Smith, filed a disclaimer of any interest in the matter.

The defendant’s answer sets up four contentions: (1) acquisition of the easement by prescription; (2) that Albert Savage and his wife, when they conveyed to Emmett Savage conveyed or gave to Emmett Savage the right of way which is in dispute; (3) that there is a public road in use for more than sixty years…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  4. North Point Consolidated Irrigation Co. v. Utah & Salt Lake Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Harkness v. WoodmanseeUtah Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Orton v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Herrera v. Roman Catholic ChurchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lunt v. KitchensUtah Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API