Harkness v. Woodmansee
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment and an order overruling a motion for a new trial of the’ district court of the first district. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Zaste, 0. J.:
It appears from the evidence in this record that defendant ' owned a lot with improvements thereon in Ogden City; that the lot had a north frontage of sixty feet on Twenty-fourth street, and that it extended south 100 feet, and was bounded on the west by Grant avenue; that adjoining this lot on the east the plaintiffs own a lot, with improvements on it, and that they claim a right of way from their lot to Grant avenue over the south ten feet of defendant's lot. The defendant having erected a building on this ten feet, the plaintiffs filed their complaint, asking the court to…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Sassman v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.