Legal Opinion

Adamson Et Ux. v. Brockbank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1947No. 6991PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATIMER, Justice.

Before treating the merits of this controversy, it is necessary to rule on and dispose of a motion to dismiss the appeal interposed by plaintiffs after the case had been argued on the merits.

Judgment for the plaintiff was given by the Trial Court on March 29, 1946. A motion for new trial was timely filed and was overruled by the court on May 17, 1946. On June 2, 1946, plaintiffs served on defendants a notice that on the 22nd day of June, 1946, counsel would move the court for an order amending the judgment and decree incertain particulars.

In the original judgment entered by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cody v. CodyUtah Supreme Court · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. ProMax Development Corp. v. RaileUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Justheim Petroleum Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Mawhinney v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Hartford Leasing Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API