Legal Opinion

Orton v. Carter

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1998No. 970391PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Defendants Rex M. Carter and Carol M. Carter, as trustees of the Rex M. Carter Family Trust (the “Carters”), appeal from the trial court’s ruling in favor of plaintiffs H. Frank Orton and Robert F. Orton, trustees of the H. Frank Orton and the Gwen R. Orton Trusts (the “Ortons”). The trial court determined the boundary between properties owned by the parties and found that each party owned an easement in a contiguous portion of the other party’s property. For the reasons stated below we affirm the trial court’s decision.

I. ORIGINS OF THE DISPUTE

The Carters and the Ortons own…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Staker v. AinsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Limb v. Federated Milk Producers AssociationUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Parker v. IrizarryUtah Supreme Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. TopanotesUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Smith v. FrandsenUtah Supreme Court · 2004

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API