Legal Opinion

Herrera v. Roman Catholic Church

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1991No. 10916PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

Plaintiff, Craig L. Herrera, appeals from a final judgment upholding an easement by necessity in favor of defendants Jose Tranquilino and Frances Martinez, husband and wife, and Orlando and Florence Martinez, husband and wife (defendants) over lands owned by plaintiff. The single issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that defendants established an easement by necessity. We affirm.

This is the second appeal arising out of the same quiet title suit. During the initial trial, defendants admitted that plaintiff was the owner in fee simple of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Othen v. RosierTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Reeves v. WimberlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Finn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Herndon v. Albuquerque Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bremer v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Bishop v. Evangelical Good Samaritan SocietyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Meyers v. Western Auto & CNA InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Campbell v. Summit Plaza AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API