Legal Opinion

Charles v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1938No. 31,655PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for new trial after verdict against him. The parties to this cause are lawyers, plaintiff residing at Park Rapids, defendant at Wadena.

The controversy between them has for its background the following facts: In an automobile accident occurring at Park Rapids on May 17, 1936, Stanley Kartak and wife, Miss Robbins, and one Campbell suffered personal injuries. Mr. Kartak on the next day employed plaintiff to prosecute both his own and his wife’s claims for damages; and a few days later plaintiff was also employed by Miss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Lawler v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Chase v. Tingdale Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Lorberbaum v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Seibert v. SeibertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Soukup v. SummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Scott-Daniels Properties, Inc. v. DresserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API