Legal Opinion

Lorberbaum v. Christopher

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1936No. 30,844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff as administrator of his wife’s estate met with' an adverse verdict in his action to recover damages tinder the wrongful death act. Being unsuccessful on his motion for new trial, he appeals.

The facts are simple and may be summarized as follows: In 1910 defendant built a four-flat building in Minneapolis and has since owned and maintained it. He secured the services of a competent architect and contractor, and the bpilding was erected according to plans and specifications furnished by the architect. The structure is of the simple and ordinary construction of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chase v. Tingdale Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Evans v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Gibbon Farmers Elevator Co. v. HerschmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. State Elevator Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ernst v. Union City MissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance v. OverholserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Oltmans Ex Rel. Oltmans v. Orthopaedic & Fracture Clinic, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Charles v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Davis v. LiesenfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API