Legal Opinion
Seibert v. Seibert
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 3, 1932No. 28,883PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff, in this her action for divorce, obtained an order on respondent, her attorney who brought the action, to show cause why he should not be dismissed from the employment and her present attorney substituted and why respondent should not be ordered to return to her the moneys he had received on account as her attorney. Substitution of attorneys was ordered and likewise a return of any papers or documents of plaintiff intrusted to the respondent; but after a hearing the court discharged that part of the order to sIioav cause which related to the return to plaintiff of the $750…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawler v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Arnold v. DauchySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Mesa County National Bank v. BerryColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Knights of the Maccabees of the World v. PeltonColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Charles v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Casebolt v. Mid-Continent Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1949