Legal Opinion

Soukup v. Summer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1964No. 39,387PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Hazel I. Soukup sued for personal injuries resulting from a collision between a car driven by her and one operated by defendant, Karon Summer. Joseph E. Soukup sought derivative damages for his wife’s injuries as well as compensation for damage to his car. Verdicts were rendered in favor of Mr. Soukup, as bailor of Mrs. Soukup’s vehicle, and in favor of defendant with respect to Mrs. Soukup’s claim. The jury thus found both drivers negligent. The Soukups appeal from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Appellants assert that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. Ferne, Admrx. v. ChaddertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Phillips v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Flaherty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daugharty v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API