Legal Opinion

Norcor of America v. Southern Arizona International Livestock Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 30, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 3073PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether appellant’s claim for damages as the result of an alleged breach of contract was barred because it failed to present the claim to the Pima County Board of Supervisors pursuant to A.R.S. Secs. 11-621 to 11-630. The trial court held that the claim was barred and we affirm. 1

The record, including the trial court’s written findings of fact, shows that in 1973 Southern Arizona International Livestock Association (SAILA) was Pima County’s agent for the purpose of operating the Pima County Fair. Pursuant to its authority as agent, it entered…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hunter v. North Mason School Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Turner v. StaggsNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Martineau v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Murphy v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API