Legal Opinion
Martineau v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 25, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 03-0056PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINTHROP, Judge.
¶ 1 The superior court granted summary judgment to Appellees (“the County”), dismissing Appellants’ declaratory judgment action challenging the validity of a policy promulgated by the County. In this opinion, we decide whether Appellants complied, and were required to comply, with Arizona’s public entity and county claim notice statutes as a prerequisite to maintaining their action for declaratory relief. We ultimately hold that Appellants were not required to comply with the claim notice statutes in order to challenge the validity of the County’s policy.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Independent Housing Services v. Fillmore Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Eller Media Co. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Crum v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Yollin v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. Mabery Ranch, Co., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.