Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Town of Chino Valley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 31, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-012PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Judge.
This is an appeal from summary judgment in superior court reversing a zoning decision of the Town of Chino Valley Board of Adjustments (the board). We reverse and remand for reinstatement of the board’s decision.
FACTS
Amos and Connie Murphy own a residence and land in the Town of Chino Valley. In 1984 the zoning on their property was changed from agricultural to R-l residential as part of a new zoning code adopted by Chino Valley. Over a period of time, the Murphys built a roping arena on their property that was used by their family and friends for riding horses and roping…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Tazza v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Eshelman v. BlubaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- McClanahan v. Cochise CollegeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Norcor of America v. Southern Arizona International Livestock Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Crosby v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.