Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOELLER, Justice.
JURISDICTION
In 1983, Pima County, acting through its agent, the City of Tucson, entered into a public works contract with Maya Construction Company (Maya) for the construction of a wastewater treatment plant. Because of disputes which arose between the parties over amounts allegedly owed under the contract, both Pima County and Maya demanded arbitration pursuant to their contract’s provisions. Maya contends that it was entitled to substantial additional monies under the contract for extras and changes, and Pima County contends that it was entitled to liquidated damages by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- In re the Arbitration between the Board of Education & Wager Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Thorgaard Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Brazoria County v. KnutsonTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Fleming v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.