Legal Opinion

Groves v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1953No. L. A. 22110PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Defendants, the City of Los Angeles, and its chief of police and city clerk (who is its tax collector) appeal from a judgment declaring invalid its Ordinance No. 77,000 as amended by Ordinance No. 92,414, and enjoining the collection of the license tax thereunder. The court found that plaintiff is engaged in the business of soliciting, effecting and negotiating undertakings of bail in and out of Los Angeles as agent of National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Company, a corporation, (hereafter called National) authorized to engage and engaged in the insurance business (including bail bonds)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bankers Life Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Garrison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Smith v. General Truck Drivers, Etc., Union Local 467District Court, S.D. California · 1960
  4. Marsh & McLennan of California, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API