Legal Opinion

Bankers Life Co. v. Richardson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1923No. Sac. Nos. 3348, 3349, 3350, and 3351 (Consolidated Cases)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

The plaintiff, Bankers Life Company, brought four actions to recover excess taxes alleged to have been illegally levied and collected by the state of California. It appeals from a judgment of the lower court in favor of Friend William Richardson, as state treasurer, defendant, and against it, as plaintiff. The primary question presented is whether or not, under the constitutional amendment relating to taxation, which was adopted November 8, 1910, and the acts passed by the legislature to carry its provisions into effect, assessments collected by plaintiff from its members under its assessment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. German Alliance Insurance v. VanCleaveIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State ex rel. O'Brien v. Continental InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Thompson v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Franklin Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Allstate Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Groves v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API