Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1982No. S.F. 24306PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The California Constitution imposes a franchise tax “on each insurer doing business in this state,” measured by the amount of “gross premiums” which the insurer receives in a particular year. (Cal. Const., art. XIII, § 28 (formerly § 14⅘); see also Rev. & Tax. Code, §§ 12201, 12221.) We must decide whether certain amounts, though never formally paid to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Metropolitan), nevertheless are to be included within the gross premiums measure of the tax imposed on its business done in California.

Metropolitan writes coverage for employee group medical…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Elfstrom v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Sweatman v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Truta v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Kirkpatrick v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API