Legal Opinion
Limited Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 2007No. A102915PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.
This matter has been remanded by the Supreme Court (SI36922) with directions to vacate our previous decision (The Limited Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board (July 28, 2005, A102915) [nonpub. opn.]) and reconsider the cause in light of Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 750 [47 Cal.Rptr.3d 216, 139 P.3d 1169] (Microsoft) and General Motors Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 773 [47 Cal.Rptr.3d 233, 139 P.3d 1183]. In our earlier decision we affirmed a summary judgment granted in favor of the Franchise Tax Board (FTB). We concluded that the full…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Stratton v. First National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Baskin v. Hughes Realty, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- General Mills, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Batt v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.