Batt v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
In Batt v. City and County of San Francisco (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 65 [65 Cal.Rptr.3d 716], we held that an individual could not maintain a class action for refund of a municipal tax absent statutory authorization. Unquestioned in our decision was the right of that individual to prosecute the action on her own behalf. That individual, plaintiff Angel Batt, thereafter had a bench trial on her claim that the City and County of San Francisco (the City) improperly required hoteliers to apply the City’s hotel *167tax to parking charges, challenging the validity of the administrative…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010